PENGARUH PERJANJIAN COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC AND TRADE AGREEMENT (CETA) OLEH UNI EROPA DAN KANADA TERHADAP EKONOMI POLITIK INTERNAL NEGARA EROPA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CETA has a great influence in the economic progress of European countries, especially in the free trade flow between countries in the world. The removal of large-scale barriers between the EU and Canada has become an important point in this agreement. On the other hand, the CETA is considered a challenge in the politics of European countries because in reality not all European societies give full support to CETA because it is perceived to only provide the economic decline of European countries and is considered to be only going into the same hole, given the Union Europe, which has also had economic cooperation with other countries and not produce results. The EU is perceived as too closed in every process of agreement making and even less involving the aspirations of other European societies. Keywords: EU, Canada, Donald Trump, CETA, Economy Politics DOI: https://doi.org/10.33005/jgp.v6i01.1881
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".