Towards a Greener Horizon: The Evolution of Farming through Green IoT Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In an era marked by the rapid evolution of Internet of Things (IoT) technologies, the agricultural sector stands at the cusp of a significant transformation. This paradigm shift, driven by the escalation of the global population and the consequent demand for increased agricultural productivity, necessitates a harmonious balance between technological advancement and environmental stewardship. This manuscript examines the integration of IoT within agricultural practices through the lens of Green IoT. This novel approach synergizes IoT technologies with sustainable agricultural practices to champion environmental sustainability. We scrutinize the economic and environmental ramifications of deploying billions of interconnected IoT devices, emphasizing their potential to redefine agricultural methodologies by promoting efficiency and optimizing resource utilization. The discourse extends to an in-depth analysis of groundbreaking IoT applications in smart farming realms, such as precision agriculture, automated irrigation systems, and crop health surveillance. It underscores their capacity to elevate agricultural output while concurrently striving to mitigate water usage, curtail chemical dependency, and diminish carbon footprints. The manuscript also delineates avenues for future investigations, spotlighting the imperative for more energy-conservative IoT solutions, the augmentation of data analytics for informed decision-making, and the encouragement of cross-disciplinary alliances to navigate the complex interface of technology and sustainable agriculture effectively. Through this exploration, the paper aspires to enrich the discourse on Green IoT and underscore its instrumental role in propelling sustainable agricultural practices amidst escalating environmental predicaments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".