MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401506954 · doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2024.3442709

Goal-Oriented Reinforcement Learning in THz-Enabled UAV-Aided Network Using Supervised Learning

2024· article· en· W4401506954 on OpenAlexaff
Atefeh Termehchi, Tingnan Bao, Aisha Syed, W. Sean Kennedy, Melike Erol‐Kantarci

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUAV Applications and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReinforcement learningComputer scienceReinforcementTerahertz radiationArtificial intelligenceMaterials scienceOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has been a key machine learning technique in many 5G and 6G applications. DRL agents learn optimal (or sub-optimal) policies by interacting with the environment. However, this process often involves numerous uninformative and repetitive message transmissions between the DRL agent and its environment. In this paper, we address the problem of reducing interactions between the DRL agent and the environment, called goal-oriented DRL. Meanwhile, Terahertz (THz) bands and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are considered two of the main enablers of 6G. Therefore, we investigate the goal-oriented DRL problem in a THz-enabled UAV-aided network. We formulate it as an optimization problem with the goals of i) reducing interactions between the UAV (DRL agent) and IoT devices (environment), ii) maximizing the number of served IoT devices, and iii) ensuring fairness. The constraints include the movement characteristics of IoT devices, the maximum speed limitation of the UAV, the QoS requirements of the served IoT devices, and the limited uplink coverage of the THz-enabled UAV. This problem is a mixed-integer nonlinear programming optimization problem and is NP-hard. To address this problem, we employ the decoupling optimization method and an approach inspired by the self-triggered method from control engineering. Specifically, the problem is divided into two sub-problems; Then, we propose using supervised learning as a teacher for DRL to reduce the interactions. Our simulation results show that the goal-oriented DRL approach outperforms conventional methods by reducing interactions and maintaining good performance in terms of the number of served IoT devices and fairness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.678
Threshold uncertainty score0.443

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Open Journal of the Communications SocietySame topicUAV Applications and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207