MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401507681 · doi:10.1109/tits.2024.3429305

Joint Cooperative Caching and UAV Trajectory Optimization Based on Mobility Prediction in the Internet of Connected Vehicles

2024· article· en· W4401507681 on OpenAlexafffund
Genghua Yu, Jian Wu, Rui Liu, Yixin He, Zhigang Chen, Jianping Pan

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersShandong Provincial Postdoctoral Science FoundationBritish Columbia Knowledge Development FundNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsTrajectoryJoint (building)Computer scienceThe InternetComputer networkSimulationEngineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the Internet of Connected Vehicles, caching content frequently requested by users on edge devices can reduce access latency. Particularly in high-traffic density areas, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) can integrate into future cellular networks to enhance the network capacity and meet increased requests. Therefore, we formulate a joint optimization problem of cooperative caching of Base Station (BS) and UAVs and UAV trajectory planning to minimize network latency while considering the limited energy and storage capacity and dynamic vehicles. First, we propose a Temporal-evolving Bipartite Graph Neural Networks (TBGN) model for traveling areas prediction of vehicles. Then, regarding the coupling of optimization variables, we propose an Energy-aware Monte-Carlo Tree Search algorithm to optimize the UAV’s service trajectory by predicted spatio-temporal vehicle density. Finally, the optimization problem degenerates into a monotonic submodular function to optimize caching decisions. We utilize real vehicle trajectories for simulations. The results show that the TBGN outperforms other advanced models in terms of mobility prediction accuracy by 7.4%, and the proposed scheme reduces average latency by 16% compared to other schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.848
Threshold uncertainty score0.543

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation SystemsSame topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207