MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Deep Learning-Assisted Phase Noise Mitigation for High-Order Modulation with Minimal Overhead

2024· article· en· W4401509643 on OpenAlexaff
Peyman Neshaastegaran, Ming Jian

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsHuawei Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOverhead (engineering)Computer sciencePhase noiseModulation (music)Noise (video)Phase (matter)Electronic engineeringArtificial intelligenceEngineeringPhysicsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces Deep Learning Assisted phase noise Estimation (DLAE), a novel method for mitigating phase noise (PN) in high-order modulations in wireless backhaul links. DLAE leverages the inherent inter-correlation among signals affected by PN, employing a tailored Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to overcome limitations observed in the existing Pilot-Symbol Assisted Modulation (PSAM) scheme. As a non-iterative solution, DLAE consistently upholds its excellent estimation accuracy, even with increased pilot spacing, rendering it particularly suitable for throughput-centric scenarios like backhaul applications. In terms of bit error rate, DLAE outperforms the PSAM scheme by over 2 dB at the 10−6level across 256-QAM, 1024-QAM, and 4096-QAM coded modulation systems under strong PN. Noteworthy is DLAE's achievement of this performance with a reduction in pilot overhead. The computational complexity of DLAE, linked to the CNN size, remains independent of the constellation size, reinforcing its practicality in high-order coded modulation systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207