MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401512039 · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a041565

Autophagy in Skeletal Muscle

2024· review· en· W4401512039 on OpenAlexaff
Anaïs Franco‐Romero, Marco Sandri, Stefano Schiaffino

Bibliographic record

VenueCold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutophagy in Disease and Therapy
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutophagyBiologyMitophagyCell biologyOrganelleMitochondrionSkeletal muscleATG16L1LysosomeFlux (metallurgy)BiochemistryAnatomyApoptosisChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Skeletal muscle fibers possess, like all cells of our body, an evolutionary conserved autophagy machinery, which allows them to segregate unfolded proteins and damaged organelles within autophagosomes, and to induce fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes, leading to degradation of those altered cell constituents. This process may be selective for specific cell components, as in the case of glycogen (glycophagy) or organelles, as with mitochondria (mitophagy). The autophagic flux is activated by fasting, and contributes with the proteasome to provide the organism with amino acids required for survival. Autophagy is also essential for the normal turnover of muscle proteins and organelles, as shown by the degenerative changes induced by genetic block of the autophagic mechanism, and in several myopathies. Autophagy is enhanced in muscle by exercise and impaired during aging, suggesting that aging-dependent muscle dysfunction could be delayed by boosting autophagy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCold Spring Harbor Perspectives in BiologySame topicAutophagy in Disease and TherapyFrench-language works237,207