MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401516748 · doi:10.1108/oxan-db288911

Tungsten demand outpaces supply amid shift from China

2024· article· en· W4401516748 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEmerald expert briefings · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMetallurgy and Cultural Artifacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaTungstenSupply and demandChristian ministryCrunchNatural resource economicsBusinessInternational tradeEconomicsPolitical scienceMetallurgyMaterials scienceMacroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significance China, the world’s largest producer of the metal, imposed 20% tariffs on tungsten concentrates in 2022 and has since restricted exports to protect domestic reserves. Its output fell by 4.6% in 2023. The supply crunch comes as demand rises from applications including tanks, jet engines, nuclear fusion reactor walls and solar panels. Impacts Seeking more output, Toronto-based Almonty Industries is restoring an old Japanese underground tungsten mine in South Korea’s mountains. Self-sufficiency drives are rising; despite large reserves, China’s Ministry of National Security defines tungsten as a critical mineral. With parts of Myanmar’s territory in the hands of rebels, output from its reserves of tin-tungsten assets has been severely affected.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.530
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEmerald expert briefingsSame topicMetallurgy and Cultural ArtifactsFrench-language works237,207