MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401517718 · doi:10.1515/ijb-2023-0116

History-restricted marginal structural model and latent class growth analysis of treatment trajectories for a time-dependent outcome

2024· article· en· W4401517718 on OpenAlexafffund
Awa Diop, Caroline Sirois, Jason R. Guertin, Mireille E. Schnitzer, James M. Brophy, Claudia Blais, Denis Talbot

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Journal of Biostatistics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreUniversité de MontréalMcGill UniversityInstitut National de Santé Publique du QuébecUniversité Laval
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversité Laval
KeywordsEconometricsMarginal structural modelOutcome (game theory)Class (philosophy)Latent class modelStructural equation modelingStatisticsMarginal modelMathematicsComputer scienceCausal inferenceMathematical economicsRegression analysisArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In previous work, we introduced a framework that combines latent class growth analysis (LCGA) with marginal structural models (LCGA-MSM). LCGA-MSM first summarizes the numerous time-varying treatment patterns into a few trajectory groups and then allows for a population-level causal interpretation of the group differences. However, the LCGA-MSM framework is not suitable when the outcome is time-dependent. In this study, we propose combining a nonparametric history-restricted marginal structural model (HRMSM) with LCGA. HRMSMs can be seen as an application of standard MSMs on multiple time intervals. To the best of our knowledge, we also present the first application of HRMSMs with a time-to-event outcome. It was previously noted that HRMSMs could pose interpretation problems in survival analysis when either targeting a hazard ratio or a survival curve. We propose a causal parameter that bypasses these interpretation challenges. We consider three different estimators of the parameters: inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), g-computation, and a pooled longitudinal targeted maximum likelihood estimator (pooled LTMLE). We conduct simulation studies to measure the performance of the proposed LCGA-HRMSM. For all scenarios, we obtain unbiased estimates when using either g-computation or pooled LTMLE. IPTW produced estimates with slightly larger bias in some scenarios. Overall, all approaches have good coverage of the 95 % confidence interval. We applied our approach to a population of older Quebecers composed of 57,211 statin initiators and found that a greater adherence to statins was associated with a lower combined risk of cardiovascular disease or all-cause mortality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.596
Threshold uncertainty score0.358

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe International Journal of BiostatisticsSame topicAdvanced Causal Inference TechniquesFrench-language works237,207