Bibliographic record
Abstract
RESUMO A questão do “comum” ganhou proeminência na fase atual do capitalismo, marcada pelo retrocesso do Estado de bem-estar social, a privatização de serviços essenciais à vida, e o agravamento da concentração de renda e das desigualdades sociais no mundo, concomitantes ao aumento exponencial da produção de bens e riquezas. Abordaremos a questão do “comum” a partir de duas referências atuais sobre o assunto, os pares Negri/ Hardt e Dardot/Laval, sobretudo a partir da crítica do segundo par ao primeiro. Mas iniciaremos a discussão com o filme “O Náufrago”, dirigido por Robert Zemeckis e estrelado por Tom Hanks, com o qual introduziremos as dimensões material e imaterial do “comum”. Destacaremos do filme a importância de outrem em nossas vidas e a questão da alteridade, cuja discussão faremos por meio dos pensamentos de Winnicott e Merleau-Ponty. Encerraremos procurando reunir as perspectivas da relação com o outro e do “comum”, desenvolvidas no artigo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".