MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401523833 · doi:10.5539/jsd.v17n5p43

AI for Sustainable Development in the Belt and Road Countries - Need for Capacity Building

2024· article· en· W4401523833 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Manzoor Hussain Soomro, Mirza Abdul Aleem Baig

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sustainable Development · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Cities and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSustainable developmentBusinessCapacity buildingNatural resource economicsEconomicsPolitical scienceEconomic growthLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

All United Nations member countries are striving to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), with information and communication technologies (ICTs) playing a crucial role in accelerating the progress. However, there is a significant disparity in technological capacities between the least developed, developing, and developed nations. Leading countries maintain dominance in these technologies, creating a digital divide that redefines richness and poverty. The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), launched by China in 2013, offers a beacon of hope for developing nations. Over the past decade, China has introduced the Global Development Initiative (GDI), Global Security Initiative (GSI), and Global Civilizations Initiative (GCI) under BRI, benefiting many developing countries. Despite these advancements, many BRI member countries lack the capacity to fully utilize these technologies and maintain the infrastructure so developed by China. There is an urgent need for education and capacity building to ensure these nations can leverage AI and ICTs for sustainable development. Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming education by offering personalized learning experiences, optimizing administrative processes, and facilitating data-driven decision-making. AI-powered educational tools can adapt to individual student needs, enhancing engagement and learning outcomes. However, transitioning from traditional to technology-driven education systems requires robust capacity-building efforts to equip educators and institutions with the necessary skills and knowledge. Collaboration between governments, academia, industry, and civil society is essential for driving innovation and integrating AI responsibly and inclusively in education. This paper highlights the need for capacity building, particularly for students at all educational levels, to prepare them for future challenges and to achieve the SDGs through AI and technology-driven education.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.023
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.121

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0230.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0070.018
Scholarly communication0.0220.034
Open science0.0040.023
Research integrity0.0130.019
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Sustainable DevelopmentSame topicSmart Cities and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207