Outcomes of sutured scleral-fixated intraocular lens implantation combined with penetrating keratoplasty
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to assess visual outcomes, complications, intraocular lens (IOL) stability, and corneal status after sutured scleral-fixated intraocular lens implantation combined with penetrating keratoplasty (PKP). METHODS: This retrospective single-arm cohort study included patients who underwent PKP and sutured scleral-fixated intraocular lens implantation between 2013 and 2018 at the Dhahran Eye Specialty Hospital. The eyes were examined postoperatively at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Corneal status, complications, and IOL status were also evaluated periodically, and the number of eyes with a BCVA of > 20/200 was recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-two eyes from 22 patients were included. The median duration of follow-up was 3 (IQR 1.8; 4.4) years. Reasons for surgery were traumatic globe rupture (six eyes, 27.3%), bullous keratopathy (nine eyes, 40.1%), failed previous graft (five eyes, 22.7%), and corneal scarring (two eyes, 9.1%). Twelve (54.5%) eyes showed a BCVA of > 20/200 (non-blind) at 12 months after surgery and only five (22.7%) before surgery. Twelve months after surgery, 13 patients showed an improvement in BCVA in two lines (59.1%), seven remained the same (31.8%), and 2 deteriorated (9.1%). The indication for surgery (p = 0.2) and the stability of the sutured-scleral fixated IOL (p = 0.8) were not associated with an improvement in BCVA at the final follow-up. The corneal graft remained clear in nine eyes (40.9%) at a median duration of 3 years. The overall average survival period for all corneal grafts was 42.9 months. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of sutured scleral-fixated intraocular lens implants and PKP is an effective intervention for preserving visual acuity in patients with complex cases. However, the risk of graft failure and then need for repeat transplantation should be taken into consideration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".