Impact of Calotropis procera on Behaviour of Leeches in Freshwater Environment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The extract of Calotrpis procers (Common Name-Rui) were tested in vitro for behavioural impact on fresh water leech (Poecilobdella viridis).The behavioural activity of leeches was determined by exposing 8 adult leeches of near about same weight and size (2 in each container) to tap water with 1 ml of plant extract for 1 hr at room temperature, 1 ml of plant extract for 2 hr at room temperature, 1 ml of plant extract for 3 hr at room temperature, 1 ml of plant extract for 4 hr at room temperature.After this exposure the leeches were transferred into other container which contained natural pond water to enable them recover from the effect of toxic extract of Calotropis procera and to act in normal behaviour.Each and every leech movement were observed from time to time and record that how many leeches were dead after 1, 2, 3, 4 hr. of exposure.The effect of Calotropis procera on the behaviour of adult leech were reflected by toxic property of extract.This plant extract shows effect on leeches were very fast causing death followed by the very aggressive behaviour as early as few minutes of exposure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".