MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401528152 · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2024.119797

A follow-up geospatial analysis and probabilistic human health risk assessment of methylmercury in fish in Eeyou Istchee (Québec, Canada)

2024· article· en· W4401528152 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Anna Krupa, Sarah E. Turner, Eric N. Liberda, Leonard J. S. Tsuji, Robert J. Moriarity

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMercury impact and mitigation studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoToronto Metropolitan UniversityToronto Public HealthConcordia University
FundersBuffalo State College - Office of Undergraduate ResearchCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchClinical Trials Fund, Canadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMethylmercuryGeospatial analysisFish <Actinopterygii>Human healthEnvironmental healthEnvironmental scienceRisk assessmentProbabilistic logicGeographyEcologyFisheryBiologyComputer scienceMedicineCartographyStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Cree Peoples of the Eeyou Istchee territory (northern Québec, Canada) rely on fish as a part of their traditional and contemporary diet. Fish is a culturally significant food and a source of nutrients, but it is also the main pathway of methylmercury (MeHg) exposure for humans. Significant hydroelectric developments in this territory are responsible for increasing the concentrations of MeHg found in fish and thus increase the human exposure to this neurotoxic compound. As this is an ongoing issue, our study assessed the current MeHg fish-tissue concentrations in Eeyou Istchee and the spatial distribution of MeHg hot spots using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to compare our results to those found in previous studies from the same region. We also performed a probabilistic hazard assessment of the exposure to MeHg from fish consumption. The GIS models indicated significant clustering of increased MeHg fish-tissue concentrations around hydroelectric reservoirs and showed higher MeHg fish-tissue concentrations around newer hydroelectric reservoirs, but a decrease in older reservoirs. Similar to past studies, we found that fish consumption continues to pose an MeHg exposure hazard for men who consume large piscivore species (i.e., lake trout, walleye, and pike), while for women, lake trout and walleye consumption constitute a hazard (any size), and pike should be consumed with caution. The hazard of exposure was mainly associated with intake rate in all cases. Lastly, we recommend monitoring MeHg fish-tissue concentrations in this region, as the MeHg tissue concentrations remain elevated, and updated consumption guidelines where and when necessitated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental ResearchSame topicMercury impact and mitigation studiesFrench-language works237,207