A momentum-resolved view of polaron formation in materials
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract An ab-initio computational methodology for interrogating the phonon contribution to polaron formation in real materials is developed that can be directly compared to experiment. Using LiF as an example, we show that the recent ab-initio theory of Sio et al.1 makes predictions of the momentum- and branch dependent phonon amplitudes in polaron quasiparticles that are testable using ultrafast electron diffuse scattering (UEDS) and related techniques. The large electron polaron in LiF has UEDS signatures that are qualitatively similar to those expected from a simple isotropic strain field model, but the small hole polaron exhibits a profoundly anisotropic UEDS pattern that is in poor agreement with an isotropic strain field. We also show that these polaron diffuse scattering signatures are directly emblematic of the underlying polaron wavefunction. The combination of new time and momentum resolved experimental probes of nonequilibrium phonons with novel computational methods promises to complement the qualitative results obtained via model Hamiltonians with a first principles, material-specific quantitative understanding of polarons and their properties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".