MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401536896 · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3443196

Socially Intelligent Path-Planning for Autonomous Vehicles Using Type-2 Fuzzy Estimated Social Psychology Models

2024· article· en· W4401536896 on OpenAlexafffund
Victor Rasidescu, Hamid Taghavifar

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceMotion planningFuzzy logicPath (computing)Fuzzy setArtificial intelligenceRobot

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel framework for socially aware path-planning in autonomous vehicles, integrating Social Value Orientation (SVO) within Artificial Potential Fields (APF) and employing Type-2 Fuzzy Logic for robust SVO approximation. By incorporating an adaptive gradient descent algorithm and leveraging a Type-2 fuzzy system for dynamic modeling of social psychology in vehicular navigation, we enhance autonomous vehicles’ ability to interpret and react to social cues in real-time traffic scenarios. Our approach significantly improves interaction with human road users, ensuring safer and more efficient navigation. The proposed model addresses the limitations of traditional APFs, such as local minima issues, by incorporating dynamic enhanced firework algorithms and resistance networks. It also considers vehicle dynamics, including nonholonomic constraints and tire forces, using a bicycle model for realistic trajectory planning. We introduce a comprehensive set of social cues for pedestrians and vehicles, operationalized through interval type-2 fuzzy system (IT2FS) approximation, to accurately estimate SVO and adjust AV behavior accordingly. Validation is conducted through extensive simulations in a realistic environment using the CARLA simulator, demonstrating the effectiveness of our socially intelligent path-planning mechanism in diverse driving situations. The results show a significant improvement in AV performance, with a 2.93% more altruistic estimation for the vehicle in the right lane and a 1.85% more altruistic estimation for the immobile vehicle. Additionally, the system demonstrated smoother acceleration and steering profiles, reducing peak longitudinal acceleration from$4.181~m/s^{2}$to$0.196~m/s^{2}$and improving overall driving stability. This framework enhances autonomous vehicles’ safety, efficiency, and social acceptability, contributing to their successful integration into urban traffic systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.230
GPT teacher head0.443
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicRobotic Path Planning AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207