MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401536896 · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3443196

Socially Intelligent Path-Planning for Autonomous Vehicles Using Type-2 Fuzzy Estimated Social Psychology Models

2024· article· en· W4401536896 on OpenAlex
Victor Rasidescu, Hamid Taghavifar

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceMotion planningFuzzy logicPath (computing)Fuzzy setArtificial intelligenceRobot

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel framework for socially aware path-planning in autonomous vehicles, integrating Social Value Orientation (SVO) within Artificial Potential Fields (APF) and employing Type-2 Fuzzy Logic for robust SVO approximation. By incorporating an adaptive gradient descent algorithm and leveraging a Type-2 fuzzy system for dynamic modeling of social psychology in vehicular navigation, we enhance autonomous vehicles’ ability to interpret and react to social cues in real-time traffic scenarios. Our approach significantly improves interaction with human road users, ensuring safer and more efficient navigation. The proposed model addresses the limitations of traditional APFs, such as local minima issues, by incorporating dynamic enhanced firework algorithms and resistance networks. It also considers vehicle dynamics, including nonholonomic constraints and tire forces, using a bicycle model for realistic trajectory planning. We introduce a comprehensive set of social cues for pedestrians and vehicles, operationalized through interval type-2 fuzzy system (IT2FS) approximation, to accurately estimate SVO and adjust AV behavior accordingly. Validation is conducted through extensive simulations in a realistic environment using the CARLA simulator, demonstrating the effectiveness of our socially intelligent path-planning mechanism in diverse driving situations. The results show a significant improvement in AV performance, with a 2.93% more altruistic estimation for the vehicle in the right lane and a 1.85% more altruistic estimation for the immobile vehicle. Additionally, the system demonstrated smoother acceleration and steering profiles, reducing peak longitudinal acceleration from <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$4.181~m/s^{2}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$0.196~m/s^{2}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> and improving overall driving stability. This framework enhances autonomous vehicles’ safety, efficiency, and social acceptability, contributing to their successful integration into urban traffic systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.672
Threshold uncertainty score0.959

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.230
GPT teacher head0.443
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it