MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401538535 · doi:10.56294/sctconf20231064

Knowledge and contribution against tax fraudation on the local economy in Guayaquil

2023· article· en· W4401538535 on OpenAlexaff
Vanessa Josefa Hernández-Alvarado, Jenory Nicole Becerra-Campi, Alexander Josué Bajaña-Jiménez, María Barragán Gáleas

Bibliographic record

VenueSalud Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicBusiness, Innovation, and Economy
Canadian institutionsCarré Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTax evasionPaymentBusinessPopulationGovernment (linguistics)Service (business)EconomyPublic economicsEconomicsFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tax evasion by taxpayers and companies constitutes a frequent crime in different economies, which indirectly impacts the local economy of any territory. In the city of Guayaquil, during the year 2022, the crime of tax fraud has been a growing concern, taking into account the impact this has on the local economy. The population of this area has seen the greatest impact reflected in public services due to their lack of attention and the decrease in the resources necessary to provide a good service to the general population. The existing situation with the lack of combativity, access to information and the population's low awareness of the issue could be verified through the study of a sample with the application of instruments that allowed it. The results obtained are evidence that tax fraud affects the economy and attention of society. The government has regulations regarding tax contributions and obligations for everyone in general, but at the same time, it lacks strict control over compliance with payments, which is why fraud by companies is common.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.131
Threshold uncertainty score0.260

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSalud Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de ConferenciasSame topicBusiness, Innovation, and EconomyFrench-language works237,207