MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Semantic-Empowered Utility Loss of Information Transmission Policy in Satellite-Integrated Internet

2024· article· en· W4401539187 on OpenAlexaff
Jianhao Huang, Jian Jiao, Ye Wang, Rongxing Lu, Qinyu Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSatellite Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceThe InternetSatelliteTransmission (telecommunications)Information transmissionSatellite broadcastingCommunications satelliteTelecommunicationsComputer networkWorld Wide WebEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recent pervasive network intelligence for 6G has further triggered extensive research into semantic communication. In response to the challenges of its effectiveness aspects, we propose a novel semantic metric, utility loss of information (UoI), that can quantify the impact of duration and severity of mismatch transceivers, and address the shortcomings of existing semantic metrics. Then, this paper contributes meaningful results centered around UoI by utilizing a deep reinforcement learning (DRL) technology to intelligently choose when to sample, how to adopt the appropriate number of coded packets, and whether to retransmit in a network coding hybrid automatic repeat request (NC HARQ) aided satellite-integrated Internet, which is characterized by high bit error rate (BER), delayed feedback, and rapid channel dynamics. The approach aims to strike an optimal tradeoff between UoI and energy consumption (TOUE). More precisely, we cast the joint minimization problem of UoIand energy consumption as a partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP). Subsequently, a prioritized experience replay-aided dueling double deep Q-network (PER-D3QN) is adopted to address this problem. Simulation results validate that our TOUE policy can yield significant gains over several state-of-the-art sampling and transmission polices, and demonstrate its sensitivity to changes in goal requirements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.933
Threshold uncertainty score0.436

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSatellite Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207