MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401539913 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2024.3442292

Towards the Vehicular Metaverse: Exploring Distributed Inference With Transformer-Based Diffusion Model

2024· article· en· W4401539913 on OpenAlexaff
Gaochang Xie, Zehui Xiong, Xinyuan Zhang, Renchao Xie, Yunjie Liu, Xuemin Shen

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicImpact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersInfo-communications Media Development AuthorityNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaMinistry of Education - SingaporeNational Research Foundation Singapore
KeywordsInferenceComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) is emerging as a promising solution for the vehicular metaverse due to its adaptable, high-quality, and multi-modal content generation capabilities. Particularly noteworthy is the recent introduction of the Sora model, a Transformer-based diffusion model, which exhibits exceptional performance in visual scenarios. However, diffusion vision transformer (DViT) models face limitations in terms of device resources, inference latency, and personalized requirements at the edge, despite their practical effectiveness in clouds. In response, we propose a DViT-enabled system to enhance vehicular metaverse services. Our approach involves a distributed DViT inference mechanism where road-side units (RSUs) and vehicles collaborate to execute the diffusion process and generate personalized content within vehicles using local prompts. Additionally, we address users' latency-sensitive service demands by formulating a distributed latency optimization problem that considers bandwidth, computation power, and dynamic positioning of heterogeneous devices. We then propose a value iteration-based distributed inference algorithm capable of adaptively determining optimal inference strategies within resource-constrained vehicular networks. Numerical simulations demonstrate that our approach achieves superior performance in reducing latency and enhancing success rates for inference tasks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.721
Threshold uncertainty score0.731

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicImpact of AI and Big Data on Business and SocietyFrench-language works237,207