MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401540664 · doi:10.1007/s10853-024-09890-0

Aluminum alloys for electrical engineering: a review

2024· review· en· W4401540664 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Materials Science · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAluminum Alloys Composites Properties
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
FundersNatural Resources CanadaOffice of Energy Research and DevelopmentGovernment of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceElectrical conductorEngineering physicsCladding (metalworking)CeramicGrain boundaryAluminiumMetallurgyComposite materialMicrostructure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract High-performance conductors are essential for economically and environmentally sustainable ways of electricity transfer in modern infrastructure, manufacturing and transportation, including electric vehicles. This report reviews the aluminum conductors, their fundamentals, classification and utilization markets, focusing on metallurgical characteristics of present commercial solutions and the strategy of future development directions. The inherent features of aluminum, both beneficial and detrimental, for electrical engineering are emphasized along with alloying concepts that provide the accelerated decomposition of matrix solid solution to minimize the electron scattering. Development activities are assessed of new generation of aluminum conductors that in addition to alloying utilize novel processing techniques such as ultra-fast crystallization, severe plastic deformation and complex thermomechanical treatments aiming at grain reduction to nanometer scale, crystallographic texture control and grain boundary engineering. Transition metals and rare earths are considered as the promising alloying candidates for high-strength conductors having superior thermal stability with extra importance given to immiscible systems of Al–Ce, Al–La and Al–Y along with multiply additions, combined to generate the synergy effects. The composites with cladding configuration and particulate reinforcement including via carbon-type strengtheners are discussed as the effective solutions of advanced conductors. A variety of strategies that aim at overcoming the strength–conductivity trade-off in conductor materials are presented throughout the report. Graphical abstract

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.846
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it