MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Rituximab Therapy for Adult Refractory Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with Neurological and/or Psychiatric Presentations: A PRISMACompliant Meta-Analysis

2024· review· en· W4401544003 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Rheumatology Reviews · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRituximabInternal medicineRefractory (planetary science)Systemic lupus erythematosusMeta-analysisClinical trialDiseaseLymphoma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Rituximab (RTX) is used off-label for refractory cases of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with extrarenal activity, including neurological and/or psychiatric (N/P) presentations. However, evidence from randomized controlled trials is limited. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to conduct a pooled analysis of the effectiveness and safety of RTX therapy for adult refractory SLE with N/P manifestations. METHODS: Electronic searches in PubMed, Epistemonikos, and ICTRP databases and statistical analysis were conducted in May 2023. RESULTS: Electronic searches identified 20 studies (25 reports). A total of 59 patients (53 females; 90%) were included, with a mean age of 33.5±10.6 years and a median disease duration of 3.5 years (range, 0.08 to 25.0) who were followed up post-RTX therapy for a median time of 12 months (range, 3.0 to 46.2). The rate of clinical response (partial or major) was 90% (95% CI, 83 to 96) (n = 57 patients). A third of responders relapsed after a median time of 9.5 months (range, 3.0 to 33.0). Pooled pre-RTX/post-RTX scores for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) (n = 13) were 19±15/7±5 and for neurological British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) (n = 29) were A/D (13), A/C (5), B/D (7), B/C (2), and A/A (2). Patients without mood disorder had a higher chance of clinical response (relative risk (RR) 1.4 (1.03 to 1.48)). Patients who benefited the most from RTX therapy were those with psychosis (a higher chance of major clinical response; RR 1.9 (1.02 to 2.34)), without acute confusional state (a lower chance of relapse; RR 0.08 (0.006 to 0.791)), and with disease duration <3 years (a lower chance of relapse; RR 0.18 (0.014 to 0.992)). Infection rate during treatment was 33% (7/21). CONCLUSION: RTX therapy had good effectiveness. The pooled evidence for safety outcomes was limited and of low certainty.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.564
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0210.007
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.218
GPT teacher head0.445
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it