Strengthening the Connections Between the Citizens and the Hellenic Parliament
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Library of the Hellenic Parliament, via its new Parliamentary Archives Department, makes continuous efforts to bridge the gap between citizens and the institution in the core of democracy, the Parliament. The library handles archives of the Parliament’s work and acquires archives concerning the political and parliamentary life of the nation. It also holds the most important and complete newspaper archives. The institution’s main mission being to support Members of Parliament (MPs), the administration, the research community, and the public, more than one bridge needs to be built in order to connect the MPs with current scientific and political developments, the work of the Parliament with the citizens, and the recordkeeping administrative services to the archives management of the library. Current actions include renovation of the archives’ storage facilities, cataloguing and appraising incoming materials, digitization programs, and cooperating with other archival institutions to be scientifically up to date and to share best practices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.020 | 0.027 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.030 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.022 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.020 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".