MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401545699 · doi:10.3390/jcm13164745

Prognostic Impacts of Age, Diagnosis Time, and Relapses in Primary CNS Lymphoma

2024· article· en· W4401545699 on OpenAlexaff
Sona Ohanyan, Chen Buxbaum, Polina Stein, Shimrit Ringelstein‐Harlev, Shahar Shelly

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta HospitalAlberta Hospital Edmonton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIncidence (geometry)Primary central nervous system lymphomaLymphomaPediatricsDiseasePresentation (obstetrics)Internal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The incidence of lymphomatous involvement of the central nervous system (CNS) has been increasing in recent years. However, the rarity of the disease has resulted in a scarcity of available data regarding its clinical presentation, natural history, and prognosis. We aimed to investigate the neurological characteristics of uncommon lymphomatous involvements confined to the CNS and to identify key variables that could serve as predictive biomarkers for treatment outcomes. Methods: We identified patients presenting with neurological symptoms and diagnosed with CNS-restricted lymphomatous involvement between 2005 and 2023. Results: We identified 44 cases, 93% of which were diagnosed with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and 7% with intravascular lymphoma. The median time from symptom onset to diagnosis was 47 days (range: 6–573 days), with no statistically significant difference between patients older and younger than 60 years (p = 0.22). The median follow-up time was 1144 days (range: 27–3501 days). Cognitive deterioration was the most common presenting symptom, occurring in 19 out of 44 patients (43%). Brain MRI revealed that lobar lesions were the most frequent location of lesions, found in 24 out of 44 patients (55%). By the end of the study period, 30 patients (68%) had died, with a median survival of 666 days (range: 17–3291 days). Death was significantly more common in patients who experienced relapses (p = 0.04; 95% CI: 0.99–0.03), with these patients having a four times higher chance of death (HR = 4.1; 95% CI: 1.01–16.09). The time to diagnosis significantly correlated with survival (p = 0.02; 95% CI: 0.005–0.54), as did the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status at the last follow-up (p = 0.006; 95% CI: 0.0012–0.62). Patients aged over 60 years did not exhibit a higher likelihood of death (p = 0.19; HR = 2.3; 95% CI: 0.63–8.61); however, the threshold age at diagnosis for the maximally predicted mortality was 64 years (ROC = 0.73; p = 0.03). Conclusions: Patients had significant delays in diagnosis, affecting patient outcomes. Cognitive deterioration and lobar lesions were prominent clinical and radiological features. Mortality was notably higher in patients with relapses and those who had a longer time to diagnosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical MedicineSame topicCNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207