Uso de informação por empreendedores acadêmicos: estudo de caso em duas universidades no Brasil e Canadá
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
hese two case studies aim to identify the origin of information related to the formation of the entrepreneurial mindset of academics at the Federal University of Minas Gerais, in Brazil, and Western University, in Canada; and characterizes the sources of information used by interviewees, their information behavior and their social interactions. It has a qualitative and descriptive characteristic, and the data was collected from documentary research and in-depth structured interviews. The question guide considers the life stories of the participants: seven teachers in Brazil and seven students from Canada. In terms of sources of information and informational behavior, there was a considerable similarity in the processes of searching and using information between the two groups of interviewees, who give preference to digital sources, interactions with peers or people close to them, and the exchange of more informal information than formal, in a systematized dynamic that is part of everyday work.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it