MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401557570 · doi:10.1080/08912963.2024.2386679

A new weigeltaspid (Heterostraci) from the Early Devonian of Nunavut, Canadian Arctic, Canada, with comments on the relationships of the weigeltaspids

2024· article· en· W4401557570 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David K. Elliott

Bibliographic record

VenueHistorical Biology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDevonianArcticPaleontologyBayGeologyDorsumTaxonThe arcticSister groupRange (aeronautics)GeographyOceanographyBiologyAnatomyPhylogenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new weigeltaspid heterostracan, Orthogoniaspis amnicus nov. sp. represents the first weigeltaspid reported from the Early Devonian Peel Sound and Snowblind Bay formations, Nunavut, Canadian Arctic. One partially articulated specimen shows for the first time that while the main plates of the dorsal shield abutted each other the orbital, pineal and rostral plates were separated by bands of tesserae. The similarity of this arrangement to that of the corvaspids, particularly the presence of dorsal lateral plates and bands of tesserae separating the anterior plates suggests a sister-group relationship, as no other heterostracans share this arrangement. Arctic weigeltaspids range from the late Ludlow to the late Lochkovian (O. amnicus nov. sp.), which is earlier than the related European taxa suggesting an Arctic centre of development for the weigeltaspids, as has been suggested for other heterostracan taxa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.163
Threshold uncertainty score0.329

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistorical BiologySame topicPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyFrench-language works237,207