MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401559512 · doi:10.1149/2162-8777/ad6f42

Synthesis, Studies of Shocked Pulse of 50 Scale on 100 Gy Irradiated Zinc Acetate Crystals for Photonic, NLO, Phase-Matching and Electronic Utilities

2024· article· en· W4401559512 on OpenAlexaff
N. Balamurugapandian, K. Suganya, R. Hariharasuthan, T. Jayanalina, Veerla Swarnalatha, K. SenthilKannan, R. Manikandan

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNonlinear Optical Materials Research
Canadian institutionsCentre for Global Health Research
FundersIndian Institute of Technology Madras
KeywordsMaterials scienceMonoclinic crystal systemOpticsIrradiationCrystal (programming language)WavelengthAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Phase (matter)ZincPhysicsOptoelectronicsCrystal structureCrystallographyChemistryNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Zinc Acetate - ZA is grown in 16–17 days as colorless crystal by slow evaporation manner; in the present work, the shocked pulses of range of 50 scaling of ZA-100 Gy irradiated sample is represented after the pulsed reference of shock waves as ZA-100Gy-50S in physical reference, the single crystalline XRD data of ZA-100Gy-50S is having 15.108, 9.254, 4.7999 of a, b, c values in Å and beta as 99.12° with P21/c as space group and monoclinic as the system; the UV-visible spectral cut-off wavelength for ZA-100Gy-50S is 224 nm; the band gap in eV as 5.53 from Tauc’s plot and is 5.5357 eV from UV-visible data. The Fluorescence wavelength gives the energy impact of 2.4047 eV. The NLO-SHG as 1.34 times than the standard KDP and the phase matching proviso of ZA-100Gy-50S is 93.8 mV The surface morphological impact of ZA-100Gy-50S crystal is with small cracks, no major flaws; the third-order NLO of ZA-100Gy-50S is of 13.92 × 10–6 esu by Z-Scan; the frequency doubling circuit and frequency tripling circuit are analyzed for the ZA-100Gy-50S and are 2.28 times, 3.23 times the input. The (111) based displaying of the display action with Red-Green-Blue filled polygonal effect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Journal of Solid State Science and TechnologySame topicNonlinear Optical Materials ResearchFrench-language works237,207