Development of an efficient design optimization strategy for thick-walled cylinders treated with combinations of autofrettage, shrink-fit and wire-winding processes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Shrink-fit, wire-winding, and autofrettage processes are commonly utilized to enhance fatigue strength and durability of thick-walled cylinders across various mechanical applications. In this study, a novel practical design optimization methodology has been developed to determine the optimal configuration of a thick-walled cylinder, incorporating different combinations of shrink-fit, wire-winding, and autofrettage techniques. The objective is to identify the optimal layer thickness, shrink-fit interference, conventional autofrettage pressure, and reverse autofrettage pressure, if applicable, to maximize the compressive residual stress and minimize the tensile residual stress, thereby extending fatigue lifetime of the cylinder. First, different configurations of thick-walled cylinders, subjected to various combinations of reinforcement processes, are identified. A dataset of residual hoop stress profiles through the cylinder thickness is subsequently generated for these configurations based on the same manufacturing process. Neural network regression is effectively utilized to construct a single fitting function for the residual hoop stress profiles. A parametric study is performed to determine the optimal training functions, activation functions, and hyperparameters, achieving a remarkable agreement with the dataset, indicated by a coefficient of determination of over 0.97. A combination of Genetic Algorithm and Sequential Quadratic Programming algorithms is utilized to determine the accurate optimal values. Fatigue life analysis is subsequently conducted to estimate the fatigue lifetime of the optimal configuration. Results suggest that the optimal configuration, involving conventional autofrettage of the inner layer followed by shrink-fitting with a virgin layer and wire-winding the entire assembly, achieves a maximum fatigue life of 88 × 10⁶ cycles under cyclic pressure load of 300 MPa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".