A phase field method for predicting hydrogen-induced cracking on pipelines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
• Develop a phase field method for assessing the threshold conditions to initiate hydrogen-induced cracks on dented pipelines. • Define the influences of dent depth, initial hydrogen concentration and internal pressure on crack initiation. • Determine the threshold values of dent depth and internal pressure to initiate cracks under hydrogen impact. An accurate determination of the threshold conditions to initiate cracks on aged hydrogen pipelines is paramount for ensuring energy transport safety. In this work, a finite element-based phase field method was developed to assess the crack initiation on dented pipelines while considering the hydrogen (H) impact. Theoretical and multi-physics numerical formulas were derived for prediction of the elastic-plastic fracture behavior of H-contained steel. A critical phase field parameter, ϕ =0.69, is defined for predicting crack initiation at the dent on pipelines. The presence of H within the steel decreases the threshold dent depth for initiating H-induced cracks. When the initial H concentration increases from 0 to 0.5 wppm, the maximum dent depth for crack initiation reduces from 17.5 mm to 10.7 mm. The maximum dent depth required for crack initiation reduces from 17.5 mm to 7.8 mm when an internal pressure of 8 MPa is applied on the steel pipe. The site with the maximum phase field parameter changes during indentation, implying that the location initiating cracks depends on the dent dimension. The existing criteria in ASME B31.12 standard are not applicable for predicting H-induced crack initiation on dented pipelines. This study proposes a new method to predict hydrogen-induced cracking on aged pipelines when transporting hydrogen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".