MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401560365 · doi:10.1145/3689051.3689059

Is Bare-metal I/O Performance with User-defined Storage Drives Inside VMs Possible? Benchmarking libvfio-user vs. Common Storage Virtualization Configurations

2024· article· en· W4401560365 on OpenAlexaff
Sebastián Rolón, Oana Balmau

Bibliographic record

VenueACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Data Storage Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBenchmarkingVirtualizationStorage virtualizationComputer scienceOperating systemBusinessCloud computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is a critical concern for cloud computing providers to identify and adopt optimal virtual machine (VM) I/O storage paths. In Linux, these involve NVMe hardware, PCIe passthrough with vfio, and userspace drivers (e.g. SPDK). One project tying together these host-side improvements with the guests is vfio-user, a library and protocol for inter-process communication of I/O operations over sockets. QEMU/KVM VMs using vfio-user and SPDK are theoretically expected to attain low latencies due to mostly userspace processing, but this VM datapath configuration is still experimental and performance data is lacking in the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM SIGOPS Operating Systems ReviewSame topicAdvanced Data Storage TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207