MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401566781 · doi:10.61919/jhrr.v4i3.1299

Time Course Effects of Kinesio Taping in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients

2024· article· en· W4401566781 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anila Kausar, Anam Rafique, Nazish Rafique, Ansa Rida Azam, Rimsha Liaqat, Mohabbat Ali

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Health and Rehabilitation Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOsteoarthritisPhysical therapyWOMACWilcoxon signed-rank testBalance (ability)RehabilitationRandomized controlled trialKnee painTimed Up and Go testSchmidt sting pain indexPhysical medicine and rehabilitationMann–Whitney U testSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Knee osteoarthritis is a common musculoskeletal disorder in the elderly, characterized by cartilage loss leading to pain, stiffness, and restricted movement. Kinesiotaping has been suggested as a therapeutic approach to reduce pain and improve functional outcomes in knee osteoarthritis patients. Objective: This study aimed to compare the effects of quadriceps and patellar kinesiotaping applied for different durations (24, 48, and 72 hours) on pain, balance, and functional performance in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Methods: A randomized clinical trial was conducted from March to September 2020 at the Railway General Hospital, Rawalpindi, and Abasyn Rehabilitation Center, Islamabad. Forty-eight patients with knee osteoarthritis (grades 2-3) were randomly assigned to three groups: Group A (kinesiotaping for 24 hours), Group B (kinesiotaping for 48 hours), and Group C (kinesiotaping for 72 hours). All participants also received conventional therapy, including hot pack application, quadriceps strengthening exercises (15 repetitions × 3 sets), and stretching exercises (5 repetitions with a 10-second hold × 3 sets). Pain, balance, and functional performance were assessed at baseline, post-intervention, and one week later using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Functional Reach Test (FRT), and Time Up and Go Test (TUG). Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25, with intragroup comparisons conducted using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and intergroup comparisons using the Kruskal-Wallis test. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Significant reductions in pain were observed across all groups (p < 0.05), with the most notable improvement in Group C (72 hours), where NPRS scores decreased from a median of 2 (IQR 1.75) at baseline to 1 (IQR 1) at follow-up (p < 0.05). However, no significant improvements were noted in balance or functional performance across the groups, as indicated by FRT, WOMAC, and TUG scores (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Kinesiotaping significantly reduces pain in knee osteoarthritis patients, particularly when applied for 72 hours, but does not appear to significantly impact balance or functional performance. These findings suggest that kinesiotaping is effective for short-term pain management, though additional interventions may be necessary to improve functional outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score0.209

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Health and Rehabilitation ResearchSame topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207