Cybersecurity Deployment in Smart Grids: Critical Review, Applications, Protection, and Challenges
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Soaring energy demand in power sector demands an intelligent electricity grid which is able to meet the energy requirements of consumers with higher efficiency and reliability. This paper discusses about how Smart Grid (SG) is the solution for such requirements in the energy sector. SG constitutes of three main components: Information Technology (IT), Operational Technology (OT), and Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI). It is important to synchronize these three components in order to seamlessly deliver electricity to the consumers connected to the electric network. Cyberattack is increasing sharply in the SG infrastructure and triggers disrupting or malicious manipulation of entire electricity network. It is crucial to maintain the data traffic, power transmission and distribution with high reliability. This paper aims at arriving at the taxonomy of attacks that are subjected to IT, OT and AMI components of SG. This exhaustive taxonomy further opens avenues to evolve mitigation strategies for these attacks which will eventually aid in SG protection. Elaborate discussion about various mitigation strategies for various types of attacks is performed. The systematic approach of methods and techniques along with the type of solution it provides to SG applications is discussed. It is evident from literature that Machine Learning (ML), Deep Learning (DL) and signal processing techniques are very efficient and robust in attack detection and retaliating in SG. ML model pro. Hence the importance of framework and tools in SG environment is analyzed. A case study is also presented that emphasizes on SG Attacks on the specific system and its mitigation strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".