Parallel Sampling of Decomposable Graphs Using Markov Chains on Junction Trees
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bayesian inference for undirected graphical models is mostly restricted to the class of decomposable graphs, as they enjoy a rich set of properties making them amenable to high-dimensional problems. While parameter inference is straightforward in this setup, inferring the underlying graph is a challenge driven by the computational difficulty in exploring the space of decomposable graphs. This work makes two contributions to address this problem. First, we provide sufficient and necessary conditions for when multi-edge perturbations maintain decomposability of the graph. Using these, we characterize a simple class of partitions that efficiently classify all edge perturbations by whether they maintain decomposability. Second, we propose a novel parallel non-reversible Markov chain Monte Carlo sampler for distributions over junction tree representations of the graph. At every step, the parallel sampler executes simultaneously all edge perturbations within a partition. Through simulations, we demonstrate the efficiency of our new edge perturbation conditions and class of partitions. We find that our parallel sampler yields improved mixing properties in comparison to the single-move variate, and outperforms current state-of-the-art methods in terms of accuracy and computational efficiency. The implementation of our work is available in the Python package parallelDG.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".