The Evolution of Power Relations in the Muscovite State in the Fortified Charters of the Late 15th – First Quarter of the 16th Centuries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
В статье рассматривается наметившееся в XV веке в Московском государстве изменение восприятия великокняжеской власти, отраженное в укрепленных и присяжных грамотах. В результате исследования было выявлено, что процесс перехода от вассальных отношений к подданническим, затронувший все общественные слои, начинался в первую очередь с «закрепления» за великим князем людей знатных уже потом продолжился закрепощением крестьян. The article examines the change in the perception of the grand princely power, which was outlined in the XVth century in the Moscow state, reflected in the fortified and sworn charters. As a result of the study, it was revealed that the process of transition from vassal relations to subject relations, which affected all social strata, began first of all with the «fixing» of noble people to the Grand Duke, and only then continued with the enslavement of the peasants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".