MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401582011 · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-68165-3

Cloud Computing and Services Science

2024· book· en· W4401582011 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in computer and information science · 2024
Typebook
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBig Data and Business Intelligence
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMagyar Tudományos Akadémia Számítástechnikai és Automatizálási KutatóintézetNational Technical University of AthensPolitechnika Swietokrzyska w KielcachUniversidade de Santiago de CompostelaUniversidade de PernambucoUniversidade Federal de PernambucoUniversità di PisaUniversidade Federal de Santa CatarinaUniversidade Estadual de CampinasThammasat UniversityTechnological University DublinUniversitetet i OsloUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulUniversidad de GranadaNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensSzegedi TudományegyetemUniversidad de SevillaUniversità degli Studi di ParmaUniversidad de MurciaBlekinge Tekniska HögskolaBen-Gurion University of the NegevUniversità degli Studi di PadovaUniversität WienUniversity of SurreyEdinburgh Napier UniversityYork UniversityUniversity of BristolUniversity of MacedoniaUniversità degli Studi di MessinaNewcastle UniversityUniversità degli Studi di MilanoUniversitat de les Illes BalearsUniversità di CataniaUniversität UlmUniversità Degli Studi di Modena e Reggio EmilaUniversity of the West of EnglandUniversitetet i StavangerShandong UniversityOklahoma State UniversityUniversity of BalamandNational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and TechnologyUniversity of New England
KeywordsCloud computingComputer scienceWorld Wide WebData scienceInformation retrievalOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.088

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.007
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCommunications in computer and information scienceSame topicBig Data and Business IntelligenceFrench-language works237,207