Awareness is not enough: Developing competencies in behaviour change counselling for obesity management
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study describes the development and evaluation of a competency based training program in behaviour change counselling for obesity management. This was a real world study attempting to obtain evidence on the learning experience; specifically, achievement of level of competency as well as personal experiences of the integration of skills learned into practice. This was a training effectiveness study involving a total of 28 evaluable licenced healthcare providers providing obesity care services. The design for this study is pre-experimental; specifically a one-group post-test only quasi-experimental design. Based on previous work developing a competency-based model of behaviour change counselling (developing change-based relationships, assessing and promoting readiness to change, implementing behaviour modification when ready, and addressing psychosocial determinants of behaviour) we report on training outcomes; specifically, the level of competency achieved in the various skill components of the intervention model. The model of training was based on corrective feedback, the development of peer-based learning and the creation of a mindmap to guide adaptation of interventions to the unique characteristics of individuals with obesity. Quantitative data on competency of components skills and qualitative information on the experience of training were used to evaluate the program. Objective assessment of skill competency post training demonstrated moderate to high skill in all aspects of behaviour change counselling. Learners reported frequent use of skills in clinical practice, particularly change-based relationships and readiness assessment/intervention. Qualitative interviews confirmed the value to learners in creating a safe place for corrective feedback, the development of the mindmap concept and the opportunity to teach back learned skills to peers. Provision of competency-based behaviour change counselling in obesity management is critical to support the reformulation of obesity as a chronic disease and to be an important adjunct to medical/surgical interventions. In this paper, we have demonstrated the value of an intensive training program for obesity providers. • The reformulation of obesity as a chronic disease allows treatments to be tailored to the complexity of the condition. • Such a development provides the opportunity to focus on behaviour change interventions to support medical therapies. • There is a lack of training programs providing core competencies from the perspective of behaviour change counselling. • In this paper we describe and evaluate a comprehensive training program. • Available evaluation data support the potential of this training program.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".