MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Psychotic Arousal and the Psychopathology of Acute Schizophrenia. An Exploratory Study of the Experiential Emotional State in Acute Psychosis

2024· preprint· en· W4401586632 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maria Margariti, Ilias Vlachos, Dimitra Mpourazana, Panagiotis Aristotelidis, Miriana Selakoviz, Maria Ifanti

Bibliographic record

VenuePreprints.org · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMental Health and Psychiatry
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens
KeywordsPsychopathologyPsychologyClinical psychologyCronbach's alphaPositive and Negative Syndrome ScaleAnxietyPsychosisExperiential learningFeelingSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Experiential avoidanceArousalPsychometricsPsychiatrySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Increasing research data suggests that dysfunction of emotional brain systems may be an important contributor for the psychophysiology of schizophrenia. However, contemporary psychopathology consistently underestimates the role of emotions in the phenomenology of the disease. Psychotic arousal (PA) is a conceptually-defined psychopathological construct aimed to portray the experiential emotional state of acute psychosis. The concept provides an explanatory model for the emergence of psychosis, and the formation and maintenance of delusions based on neurobiological models on the formation of core consciousness and subjectivity. This is the first exploratory study of the major assumptions, endorsed in the project summarised as follows: 1) Psychotic arousal is a discrete state, eligible to investigation; 2) Abnormal experiential feelings are an integral part of this state; 3) The state is responsive to antipsychotic intervention during the first weeks of treatment.Methods: We developed accordingly the Psychotic Arousal Scale (PAS), explored its first psychometric properties and tested its relation to other psychopathological measures. 55 acute schizophrenia patients were evaluated with the PAS, the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, the Brown Assessment of Beliefs Scale, the Hamilton Anxiety, and the Calgary Depression. Cronbach α coefficients, t- test analysis, correlations and mixed linear regression models were applied for testing internal reliability of the scale, associations between parameters and sensitivity to change in three time periods during therapeutic intervention.Results: Results of the study support that (PA) is eligible for investigation as a discrete psychopathological state, abnormal experiential feelings are an integral part of this state, it presents high affinity with other affective measures, its degree of severity relates to the delusions’ conviction, and is amenable to antipsychotics early in treatment during the acute psychotic episode.Conclusions: Findings of this exploratory study are connotative of the presence of an emotional arousal impregnated by abnormal experiential feelings during acute psychosis, largely overlooked by contemporary psychopathology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePreprints.orgSame topicMental Health and PsychiatryFrench-language works237,207