MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401587303 · doi:10.1101/2024.08.13.607794

Galvanotactic directionality of cell groups depends on group size

2024· preprint· en· W4401587303 on OpenAlexaff
Calina Copos, Yaohui Sun, Kan Zhu, Yan Zhang, Brian Reid, Bruce W. Draper, Francis Lin, Haicen Yue, Yelena Bernadskaya, Min Zhao, Alex Mogilner

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlanarian Biology and Electrostimulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCathodeAnodeGroup (periodic table)Electric fieldChemistryBiophysicsLamellipodiumElectrodeCellCell migrationPhysicsBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Motile cells migrate directionally in the electric field in a process known as galvanotaxis, important and under-investigated phenomenon in wound healing and development. We previously reported that individual fish keratocyte cells migrate to the cathode in electric fields, that inhibition of PI3 kinase reverses single cells to the anode, and that large cohesive groups of either unperturbed or PI3K-inhibited cells migrate to the cathode. Here we find that small uninhibited cell groups move to the cathode, while small groups of PI3K-inhibited cells move to the anode. Small groups move faster than large groups, and groups of unperturbed cells move faster than PI3K-inhibited cell groups of comparable sizes. Shapes and sizes of large groups change little when they start migrating, while size and shapes of small groups change significantly, lamellipodia disappear from the rear edges of these groups, and their shapes start to resemble giant single cells. Our results are consistent with the computational model, according to which cells inside and at the edge of the groups pool their propulsive forces to move but interpret directional signals differently. Namely, cells in the group interior are directed to the cathode independently of their chemical state. Meanwhile, the edge cells behave like individual cells: they are directed to the cathode/anode in uninhibited/PI3K-inhibited groups, respectively. As a result, all cells drive uninhibited groups to the cathode, while larger PI3K-inhibited groups are directed by cell majority in the group interior to the cathode, while majority of the edge cells in small groups win the tug-of-war driving these groups to the anode. Significance statement Motile cells migrate directionally in electric fields. This behavior – galvanotaxis – is important in many physiological phenomena. Individual fish keratocytes migrate to the cathode, while inhibition of PI3K reverses single cells to the anode. Uninhibited cell groups move to the cathode. Surprisingly, groups of PI3K-inhibited cells exhibit bidirectional behavior: larger/smaller groups move to the cathode/anode, respectively. A mechanical model suggests that inner and outer cells interpret directional signals differently, and that a tug-of-war between the outer and inner cells directs the cell groups. These results shed light on general principles of collective cell migration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicPlanarian Biology and ElectrostimulationFrench-language works237,207