Distribution and comparative genomic analysis of antimicrobial gene clusters found in Pantoea
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Members of the bacterial genus Pantoea produce a variety of antimicrobial products that are effective against plant, animal, and human pathogens. To date, little is known about the distribution and evolutionary history of these clusters. We surveyed the public databases for the 12 currently known antibiotic biosynthetic gene clusters found across Pantoea strains to determine their distribution. We show that some clusters, namely pantocin B, PNP-3, and PNP-4 are found strictly in Pantoea, while agglomerin, andrimid, AGA, dapdiamide, herbicolin, PNP-1, PNP-2, PNP-5, and pantocin A, are more broadly distributed in distantly related genera within Vibrionaceae, Pectobacteriaceae, Yersiniaceae, Morganellaceae, and Hafniaceae. We evaluated the evolutionary history of these gene clusters relative to a cpn60-based species tree, considering the flanking regions of each cluster, %GC, and presence of mobile genetic elements, and identified potential occurrences of horizontal gene transfer. Lastly, we also describe the biosynthetic gene cluster of pantocin B in the strain Pantoea agglomerans Eh318 more than 20 years after this antibiotic was first described.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".