MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401588814 · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad676e

Corvus A: A Low-mass, Isolated Galaxy at 3.5 Mpc

2024· article· en· W4401588814 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Michael G. Jones, David J. Sand, Burçı̇n Mutlu-Pakdı̇l, Catherine E. Fielder, Denija Crnojević, Paul Bennet, Kristine Spekkens, Richard L. Donnerstein, Amandine Doliva-Dolinsky, Ananthan Karunakaran, Jay Strader, Dennis Zaritsky

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDunlap Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of TorontoNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsGalaxyPhysicsRed-giant branchAstrophysicsPopulationArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceMetallicityMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We report the discovery of Corvus A, a low-mass, gas-rich galaxy at a distance of approximately 3.5 Mpc, identified in DR10 of the Dark Energy Camera Legacy Imaging Survey during the initial phase of our ongoing SEmi-Automated Machine LEarning Search for Semi-resolved galaxies (SEAMLESS). Jansky Very Large Array observations of Corvus A detect H i line emission at a radial velocity of 523 ± 2 km s−1. Magellan/Megacam imaging reveals an irregular and complex stellar population with both young and old stars. We detect UV emission in Neil Gehrels Swift observations, indicative of recent star formation. However, there are no signs of H ii regions in Hα imaging from Steward Observatory’s Kuiper telescope. Based on the Megacam color–magnitude diagram we measure the distance to Corvus A via the tip of the red giant branch standard candle as 3.48 ± 0.24 Mpc. This makes Corvus A remarkably isolated, with no known galaxy within ∼1 Mpc. Based on this distance, we estimate the H i and stellar mass of Corvus A to be log M H I / M ⊙ = 6.59 and log M * / M ⊙ = 6.0 , respectively. Although there are some signs of rotation, the H i distribution of Corvus A appears to be close to face on, analogous to that of Leo T, and we therefore do not attempt to infer a dynamical mass from its H i line width. Higher-resolution synthesis imaging is required to confirm this morphology and to draw robust conclusions from its gas kinematics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal LettersSame topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207