MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401589835 · doi:10.1186/s13321-024-00892-3

Metis: a python-based user interface to collect expert feedback for generative chemistry models

2024· article· en· W4401589835 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cheminformatics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Drug Discovery Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHorizon 2020Engineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilVetenskapsrådetUK Research and InnovationKnut och Alice Wallenbergs StiftelseFinnish Center for Artificial IntelligenceEuropean CommissionChalmers Tekniska Högskola
KeywordsComputer sciencePython (programming language)Graphical user interfaceHuman–computer interactionInterface (matter)User interfaceGenerative grammarGenerative modelHuman-in-the-loopSoftware engineeringData scienceArtificial intelligenceProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One challenge that current de novo drug design models face is a disparity between the user's expectations and the actual output of the model in practical applications. Tailoring models to better align with chemists' implicit knowledge, expectation and preferences is key to overcoming this obstacle effectively. While interest in preference-based and human-in-the-loop machine learning in chemistry is continuously increasing, no tool currently exists that enables the collection of standardized and chemistry-specific feedback. Metis is a Python-based open-source graphical user interface (GUI), designed to solve this and enable the collection of chemists' detailed feedback on molecular structures. The GUI enables chemists to explore and evaluate molecules, offering a user-friendly interface for annotating preferences and specifying desired or undesired structural features. By providing chemists the opportunity to give detailed feedback, allows researchers to capture more efficiently the chemist's implicit knowledge and preferences. This knowledge is crucial to align the chemist's idea with the de novo design agents. The GUI aims to enhance this collaboration between the human and the "machine" by providing an intuitive platform where chemists can interactively provide feedback on molecular structures, aiding in preference learning and refining de novo design strategies. Metis integrates with the existing de novo framework REINVENT, creating a closed-loop system where human expertise can continuously inform and refine the generative models.Scientific contributionWe introduce a novel Graphical User Interface, that allows chemists/researchers to give detailed feedback on substructures and properties of small molecules. This tool can be used to learn the preferences of chemists in order to align de novo drug design models with the chemist's ideas. The GUI can be customized to fit different needs and projects and enables direct integration into de novo REINVENT runs. We believe that Metis can facilitate the discussion and development of novel ways to integrate human feedback that goes beyond binary decisions of liking or disliking a molecule.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.257
Threshold uncertainty score0.632

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it