High‐power radio frequency wireless energy transfer system: Comprehensive survey on design challenges
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Feeding electrical components without having a physical contact was always a goal in electrical engineering. Nowadays, Wireless Power Transfer (WPT) is becoming the main way to provide energy for wireless sensors. WPT can be categorised into two primary techniques: radiative and non‐radiative methods. The authors uniquely delve into the utilisation of radiative methods, precisely the Radio Frequency (RF)‐WPT method. The authors focus on the factors and considerations for designing this kind of systems highlighting the specific nuances and challenges associated with high power wireless energy transfer systems and will try to define an efficient design method. A comprehensive survey is offered encompassing the entire system. It explores both transmitter and receiver systems, dissecting their subsystems and elements and challenges related to high power application one by one, while also elucidating the essential principles and integration factors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it