Smart IoT SCADA System for Hybrid Power Monitoring in Remote Natural Gas Pipeline Control Stations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A pipeline network is the most efficient and rapid way to transmit natural gas from source to destination. The smooth operation of natural gas pipeline control stations depends on electrical equipment such as data loggers, control systems, surveillance, and communication devices. Besides having a reliable and consistent power source, such control stations must also have cost-effective and intelligent monitoring and control systems. Distributed processes are monitored and controlled using supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) technology. This paper presents an Internet of Things (IoT)-based, open-source SCADA architecture designed to monitor a Hybrid Power System (HPS) at a remote natural gas pipeline control station, addressing the limitations of existing proprietary and non-configurable SCADA architectures. The proposed system comprises voltage and current sensors acting as Field Instrumentation Devices for required data collection, an ESP32-WROOM-32E microcontroller that functions as the Remote Terminal Unit (RTU) for processing sensor data, a Blynk IoT-based cloud server functioning as the Master Terminal Unit (MTU) for historical data storage and human–machine interactions (HMI), and a GSM SIM800L module and a local WiFi router for data communication between the RTU and MTU. Considering the remote locations of such control stations and the potential lack of 3G, 4G, or Wi-Fi networks, two configurations that use the GSM SIM800L and a local Wi-Fi router are proposed for hardware integration. The proposed system exhibited a low power consumption of 3.9 W and incurred an overall cost of 40.1 CAD, making it an extremely cost-effective solution for remote natural gas pipeline control stations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".