MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401596058 · doi:10.51731/cjht.2024.949

Canadian Medical Imaging Inventory 2022–2023: PET-CT and PET-MRI

2024· article· en· W4401596058 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
CADTH

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Health Technologies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePET-CTNuclear medicinePopulationPositron emission tomographyMedical physicsEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PET-CT Imaging PET-CT is an advanced imaging technique that combines PET with CT to measure metabolic or biochemical activity in the human body. Sixty PET-CT units in 9 provinces were identified by the Canadian Medical Imaging Inventory (CMII) in its 2022–2023 national survey. All units are located in urban centres. Canada has 1.5 PET-CT units per million people. The greatest density of units per million people is in Quebec, New Brunswick, and Newfoundland and Labrador. Approximately 156,320 publicly funded PET-CT examinations were performed in the 2022–2023 fiscal year. This represents a national average of 3.9 exams per 1,000 people, an increase of 18.2% since 2019– PET-CT was reported to have the largest demand in oncology (66.1%), followed by cardiology (13.2%) and neurology (10.1%). Applications for PET-CT continue to expand to new clinical indications and therapeutic areas. The upfront capital and ongoing operational costs of PET-CT units, as well as the costs of radiopharmaceutical products and equipment, may act as barriers to the rapid adoption of this technology. Canada is positioned in the bottom 25% of Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries in units per million population and the bottom 50% of OECD countries for average volume of publicly funded PET-CT exams per 1,000 population. The average age of PET-CT equipment in Canada is 7.2 years; 51.5% of PET-CT units are 5 years old or newer, 21.2% are 6 to 10 years old, and 27.3% are more than 10 years old. Radiotracers are essential in PET imaging. The most commonly used PET-CT radiotracers are for oncology: 91% of sites reported using fluorodeoxyglucose F18 and 31.8% of sites reported using gallium-68 DOTA-TATE. The production of most radiotracers requires the use of a cyclotron.1 Overall, 21.7% of PET-CT sites reported local proximity to a cyclotron, reflecting a disparity in the access to and growing demand for radiotracer supply. PET-MRI Imaging PET-MRI is a technique that combines PET with MRI to produce highly detailed imaging of soft tissues in the human body. PET-MRI is almost exclusively used for research purposes in Canada; therefore, data are limited for this modality. Six PET-MRI units were identified in Canada across 3 provinces, representing a national average of 0.2 units per million people. The average age of PET-MRI equipment in Canada is 6.7 years; 2 units are 6 to 10 years old, and 1 unit is 5 years old.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score0.289

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0100.014
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0540.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Health TechnologiesSame topicMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207