MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401596293 · doi:10.51731/cjht.2024.951

Canadian Medical Imaging Inventory 2022–2023: MRI

2024· article· en· W4401596293 on OpenAlexaffabout
CADTH

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Health Technologies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiation Dose and Imaging
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Health Information
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePopulationMagnetic resonance imagingNuclear medicineMedical imagingDemographyRadiologyEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MRI is a noninvasive imaging modality that uses powerful electromagnetic and radiofrequency fields to produce cross-sectional images of the body. MRI is primarily used for neurologic exams (28%), followed by musculoskeletal (23%) and oncology exams (17%). In total, 432 MRI units in 11 jurisdictions were identified by the Canadian Medical Imaging Inventory (CMII) in its 2022 to 2023 national survey. Most sites are publicly funded hospitals located in urban centres. Canada has an average of 10.8 MRI units per million people. The greatest density of units per million people is in Yukon, Quebec, and New Brunswick. Overall, 2,214,157 publicly funded MRI examinations were performed in the 2022–2023 fiscal year. This represents a national average of 55.6 exams per 1,000 people, an increase of 4.3% since 2019– Canada is positioned in the bottom 25% of Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries in units per million population and the bottom 50% of OECD countries for average volume of publicly funded MRI exams per 1,000 population. The average age of MRI equipment in Canada is 8.4 years; 62.8% of MRI units are 10 years old or newer, 23.3% are 11 to 15 years old, and 13.9% are more than 15 years old. On average, MRI units operate 15.3 hours per day and 97.4 hours per week. Overall, 76.0% of sites reported MRI operation on weekends and 17% of sites reported operating 24 hours a day.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0090.017
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0690.023

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Health TechnologiesSame topicRadiation Dose and ImagingFrench-language works237,207