Scatter estimation and correction using time-of-flight and deconvolution in x-ray medical imaging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objective. Time-of-flight (TOF) scatter rejection requires a total timing jitter, including the detector timing jitter and the x-ray source’s pulses width, of 50 ps or less to mitigate most of the effects of scattered photons in radiography and CT imaging. However, since the total contribution of the source and detector to the timing jitter can be retrieved during an acquisition with nothing between the source and detector, it can be demonstrated that this contribution may be partially removed to improve the image quality. Approach. A scatter correction method using iterative deconvolution of the measured time point-spread function estimates the number of scattered photons detected in each pixel. To evaluate the quality of the estimation, GATE was used to simulate the radiography of a water cylinder with bone inserts, and a head and torso in a system with total timing jitters from 100 ps up to 500 ps full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM). Main results. With a total timing jitter of 200 ps FWHM, 89% of the contrast degradation caused by scattered photons was recovered in a head and torso radiography, compared to 28% with a simple time threshold method. Corrected images using the estimation have a percent root-mean square error between 2% and 14% in both phantoms with timing jitters from 100 to 500 ps FWHM which is lower than the error achieved with scatter rejection alone at 100 ps FWHM. Significance. TOF x-ray imaging has the potential to mitigate the effects of the scattering contribution and offers an alternative to anti-scatter grids that avoids loss of primary photons. Compare to simple TOF scatter rejection using only a threshold, the deconvolution estimation approach has lower requirements on both the source and detector. These requirements are now within reach of state-of-the-art systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".