Marco de resiliencia hidráulica urbana. Caso de aplicación Chihuahua, Méx.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Water Resilience Approach of a City aims to ensure that cities have a sustainable development based on their capacity and water systems, this work aimed to understand the tensions that can affect the city’s water basin and thereby evaluate the resilience of the city’s water basin. By calculating the resilience index according to the methodology to the City Water Resilience Framework (CWRF). The capacity of the urban water system, including social, political, economic, physical and natural assets, can be established to anticipate, absorb, adapt, respond and learn from factors and tensions, in order to protect public health and well-being, the natural environment and minimize economic disruption. Considering the analysis of the factors that proved to be most influential were: the state of infrastructure, the deterioration of supply sources and the political environment. Some of the most influential issues.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.017 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it