Quality-Aware Task Offloading for Cooperative Perception in Vehicular Edge Computing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Task offloading in Vehicular Edge Computing (VEC) can advance cooperative perception (CP) to improve traffic awareness in Autonomous Vehicles. In this paper, we propose the Quality-aware Cooperative Perception Task Offloading (Q-CPTO) scheme. Q-CPTO is the first task offloading scheme that enhances traffic awareness by prioritizing the quality rather than the quantity of cooperative perception. Q-CPTO improves the quality of CP by curtailing perception redundancy and increasing the Value of Information (VOI) procured by each user. We use Kalman filters (KFs) for VOI assessment, predicting the next movement of each vehicle to estimate its region of interest. The estimated VOI is then integrated into the task offloading problem. We formulate the task offloading problem as an Integer Linear Program (ILP) that maximizes the VOI of users and reduces perception redundancy by leveraging the spatially diverse fields of view (FOVs) of vehicles, while adhering to strict latency requirements. We also propose the Q-CPTO-Heuristic (Q-CPTO-H) scheme to solve the task offloading problem in a time-efficient manner. Extensive evaluations show that Q-CPTO significantly outperforms prominent task offloading schemes by up to 14% and 20% in terms of response delay and traffic awareness, respectively. Furthermore, Q-CPTO-H closely approaches the optimal solution, with marginal gaps of up to 1.4% and 2.1% in terms of traffic awareness and the number of collaborating users, respectively, while reducing the runtime by up to 84%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".