Contribution of intraflagellar transport to compartmentalization and maintenance of the photoreceptor cell
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The first steps of vision take place in the ciliary outer segment compartment of photoreceptor cells. The protein composition of outer segments is uniquely suited to perform this function. The most abundant among these proteins is the visual pigment, rhodopsin, whose outer segment trafficking involves intraflagellar transport (IFT). Here, we report three major findings from the analysis of mice in which ciliary transport was acutely impaired by conditional knockouts of IFT-B subunits. First, we demonstrate the existence of a sorting mechanism whereby mislocalized rhodopsin is recruited to and concentrated in extracellular vesicles prior to their release, presumably to protect the cell from adverse effects of protein mislocalization. Second, reducing rhodopsin expression significantly delays photoreceptor degeneration caused by IFT disruption, suggesting that controlling rhodopsin levels may be an effective therapy for some cases of retinal degenerative disease. Last, the loss of IFT-B subunits does not recapitulate a phenotype observed in mutants of the BBSome (another ciliary transport protein complex relying on IFT) in which non-ciliary proteins accumulate in the outer segment. Whereas it is widely thought that the role of the BBSome is to primarily participate in ciliary transport, our data suggest that the BBSome has another major function independent of IFT and possibly related to maintaining the diffusion barrier of the ciliary transition zone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".