MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401610542 · doi:10.18260/1-2-1112.1153-48579

Work-Integrated Learning: An Alternative Pathway for High School Physics

2024· article· en· W4401610542 on OpenAlexaff
Vanessa Ironside, Lisa Cole, Michelle Tsui-Woods

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous and Place-Based Education
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)Engineering educationUnderrepresented MinorityEngineering ethicsMathematics educationEngineering managementEngineeringMedical educationMechanical engineeringPsychologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

k2i academy within the Lassonde School of Engineering at York University is committed to dismantling systemic barriers that impact underrepresented youth in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM), including women, Black youth, and Indigenous youth.A barrier to pursuing engineering and many sciences in post-secondary is high school prerequisite courses, with grade 11 university physics presenting the largest barrier for students, especially those from non-dominant communities.The Bringing STEM to Life: Work-Integrated program addresses this challenge by providing a paid work experience integrated with a high school physics credit for youth who have opted out of physics from underserved communities.The objective is to explore physics fundamentals through hands-on learning that incorporates engineering design and coding, while providing representative mentors from STEM disciplines to create a sense of belonging within STEM spaces.This paper will explore the impact, successes, limitations and next steps for the program and propose how this program might expand to further support deserving communities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.101

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0040.019
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIndigenous and Place-Based EducationFrench-language works237,207