Adaptive Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion Control for Aerial Manipulators
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes an adaptive incremental nonlinear dynamic inversion (INDI) controller for unmanned aerial manipulators (UAMs). A novel adaptive law is employed to enable aerial manipulators to manage the inertia parameter changes that occur when the manipulator moves or picks up unknown objects during any phase of the UAM’s flight maneuver. The adaptive law utilizes a Kalman filter to estimate a set of weighting factors employed to adjust the control gain matrix of a previously developed INDI control law formulated for the corresponding UAV (no manipulator included). The proposed adaptive control scheme uses acceleration and actuator input measurements of the UAV without necessitating any knowledge about the manipulator, its movements, or the objects being grasped, thus enabling the use of previously developed INDI UAV controllers for UAMs. The algorithm is validated through simulations demonstrating that the adaptive control gain matrix used in the UAV’s INDI controller is promptly updated based on the UAM maneuvers, resulting in effective UAV and robot arm control.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".