Existence of multiple transitions of the critical state due to anesthetics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Scale-free statistics of coordinated neuronal activity, suggesting a universal operating mechanism across spatio-temporal scales, have been proposed as a necessary condition of healthy resting-state brain activity. Recent studies have focused on anesthetic agents to induce distinct neural states in which consciousness is altered to understand the importance of critical dynamics. However, variation in experimental techniques, species, and anesthetics, have made comparisons across studies difficult. Here we conduct a survey of several common anesthetics (isoflurane, pentobarbital, ketamine) at multiple dosages, using calcium wide-field optical imaging of the mouse cortex. We show that while low-dose anesthesia largely preserves scale-free statistics, surgical plane anesthesia induces multiple dynamical modes, most of which do not maintain critical avalanche dynamics. Our findings indicate multiple pathways away from default critical dynamics associated with quiet wakefulness, not only reflecting differences between these common anesthetics but also showing significant variations in individual responses. This is suggestive of a non-trivial relationship between criticality and the underlying state of the subject. The significance of deviations from scale-free (SF) neural activity for consciousness is unclear. Using anesthetics, the authors show multiple paths from SF activity, indicating a complex relationship between non-SF activity and the participant’s state.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".